Skip to main content

5 tips to increase trust in your group

I received the following questions from one of our readers:

Can people ever work well together based on trust if there are people in the group who actually don't want to?
Can you give trust when part of the group does not want to / does not?

How can you ever work together based on equality and trusting in the best outcome when members of the group actually do not want to? I think this is very difficult. Is there any setting possible to work in a group based on trust if one or a few members of this group have a rather casual attitude?

You cannot enforce trust, but you do need it in a collaboration. It is a necessary ingredient. You must be able to trust others to take their responsibility, trust them to not abuse the freedom that arises, trust that equality is really equality.

What you can do is create an environment where trust has every chance to grow (and flourish). The following principles will help you to work safely with the CONSENT-method. Go through them as a checklist and see what else your team needs:

1 - Decide together whether you want to work together on the basis of CONSENT.
Actually this is the most important condition. If you want to try it out first, agree on a period in which you will use the CONSENT-method (unconditionally and by everyone) and agree on how and when you will evaluate and what you will do with the outcome of the evaluation.

2 - Really give everyone in the conversation their own space.
Make sure that 'dominant' people have the same voice as the other members and make sure that these people let the other person speak and do not interrupt (not even with a nice joke in between).

3 - Decide based on everyone’s consent and immediately attach an action point to them.
This can be an action, a result or a (small) follow-up step. When it is clear that something has to be done, it is easier to trust that a person or group of people will actually do this. In this way you also ensure that subjects do not 'simmer' and thus cause confusion and unrest. You make a decision together and then also reflect whether the decision has been properly implemented. It is also possible to decide with consent that there is no consent. Earlier I wrote a (Dutch) blog about it.

4 - Clarify the domain within which this group can make decisions.
And therefore also what cannot be decided because it falls outside the domain. Especially if you assume this is obvious, it makes extra sense to consider this. What seems obvious is the easiest to overlook. All too often I encounter situations where there is a lack of clarity around domains and this is precisely what undermines mutual trust.

5 - Put it on the agenda if you don't feel safe.
Take the first step, open up the conversation, make sure this too becomes transparent. This way trust can grow and cooperation can continue from a safe situation. This can be quite exciting, but you will see this will allow you and the group to grow.

Bonus Tip: Stick to our Conversation Etiquette!
On the right you can subscribe to our newsletter and receive our Conversation Etiquette as a PDF. You can print this handy cheat sheet and hand it out to all attendees during the meeting. These simple rules provide a lot of guidance and clarity and therefor they provide a safe basis for the conversation.

Working with the CONSENT-method is not difficult, but it does require some adjustment from those involved!

Let me know in the comments below if these tips where helpful! And tell me: what are important conditions for you to feel safe and to be able to give confidence?

I received the following questions from one of our readers:

Can people ever work well together based on trust if there are people in the group who actually don't want to?
Can you give trust when part of the group does not want to / does not?

How can you ever work together based on equality and trusting in the best outcome when members of the group actually do not want to? I think this is very difficult. Is there any setting possible to work in a group based on trust if one or a few members of this group have a rather casual attitude?

You cannot enforce trust, but you do need it in a collaboration. It is a necessary ingredient. You must be able to trust others to take their responsibility, trust them to not abuse the freedom that arises, trust that equality is really equality.

What you can do is create an environment where trust has every chance to grow (and flourish). The following principles will help you to work safely with the CONSENT-method. Go through them as a checklist and see what else your team needs:

1 - Decide together whether you want to work together on the basis of CONSENT.
Actually this is the most important condition. If you want to try it out first, agree on a period in which you will use the CONSENT-method (unconditionally and by everyone) and agree on how and when you will evaluate and what you will do with the outcome of the evaluation.

2 - Really give everyone in the conversation their own space.
Make sure that 'dominant' people have the same voice as the other members and make sure that these people let the other person speak and do not interrupt (not even with a nice joke in between).

3 - Decide based on everyone’s consent and immediately attach an action point to them.
This can be an action, a result or a (small) follow-up step. When it is clear that something has to be done, it is easier to trust that a person or group of people will actually do this. In this way you also ensure that subjects do not 'simmer' and thus cause confusion and unrest. You make a decision together and then also reflect whether the decision has been properly implemented. It is also possible to decide with consent that there is no consent. Earlier I wrote a (Dutch) blog about it.

4 - Clarify the domain within which this group can make decisions.
And therefore also what cannot be decided because it falls outside the domain. Especially if you assume this is obvious, it makes extra sense to consider this. What seems obvious is the easiest to overlook. All too often I encounter situations where there is a lack of clarity around domains and this is precisely what undermines mutual trust.

5 - Put it on the agenda if you don't feel safe.
Take the first step, open up the conversation, make sure this too becomes transparent. This way trust can grow and cooperation can continue from a safe situation. This can be quite exciting, but you will see this will allow you and the group to grow.

Bonus Tip: Stick to our Conversation Etiquette!
On the right you can subscribe to our newsletter and receive our Conversation Etiquette as a PDF. You can print this handy cheat sheet and hand it out to all attendees during the meeting. These simple rules provide a lot of guidance and clarity and therefor they provide a safe basis for the conversation.

Working with the CONSENT-method is not difficult, but it does require some adjustment from those involved!

Let me know in the comments below if these tips where helpful! And tell me: what are important conditions for you to feel safe and to be able to give confidence?

Dit artikel is geschreven door

Baudy Wiechers

  • Dit e-mailadres wordt beveiligd tegen spambots. JavaScript dient ingeschakeld te zijn om het te bekijken.

Reviews

Na 4 enorm inspirerende trainingsdagen heeft het CONSENT gedachtegoed mij doen inzien dat dit misschien wel de enige manier is waarop ik wil samenwerken. Het voelt zo intuïtief en natuurlijk om op deze manier met elkaar om te gaan.
Gonny Tomassen
Docent en mede-oprichter BuitenDelen
We passen de CONSENT-methode ook toe in kringen met kinderen over allerlei onderwerpen, zoals schoolreisje, voetballen, sinterklaas, namen van vissen, opruimen en omgang met elkaar. Ook zo'n kring vind ik genieten. Kinderen zien groeien in ruimte geven en nemen, zich uit durven spreken, van mening durven veranderen en ze uiteindelijk plezier zien beleven aan een besluit waaraan ze echt een bijdrage hebben geleverd... fantastisch!
Agnes Bouwmeester
Docent Basisonderwijs
Conflictbemiddeling met de Consent-methode biedt een duidelijke structuur, geeft houvast en daardoor vertrouwen. Betrokkenen gaan veel rustiger het gesprek aan dan ze anders doen. Omdat ze weten dat ook zij aan bod komen hoeven ze de ander niet in de rede te vallen en kunnen daardoor beter luisteren. Zo komt een oplossing sneller in zicht.
John van Bemmelen
Interim directeur onderwijs
Wat ik vooral meegenomen heb uit de training is dat je met mensen die je niet kent op een persoonlijke vraag zoveel waardevolle antwoorden kunt krijgen, eenvoudig door de methodiek toe te passen. Dat maakt de training ook heel krachtig. Je eigen agendapunten indienen in een training. Het is volgens mij ook vrij uniek. Je krijgt inspiratie op iets waar je mee te maken hebt en leert tegelijkertijd de methodiek!
Annemiek Kamp
Zelfstandig ondernemer en docent bij LOS Deurne
In mijn functie als teamcoach ervaar ik de Consent-methode als een heel krachtig instrument om effectief te vergaderen en samen gedragen besluiten te nemen. Sinds ik de Gespreksleiderstraining heb gevolgd kan ik mijn teams beter faciliteren, is er meer commitment en draagvlak voor de genomen besluiten.
Eva Keblusek
Trainer en (Team)coach
Ik werk als teamcoach binnen de Rijksoverheid en de organisatie waar ik deel van uitmaak is een paar jaar geleden overgegaan naar zelforganisatie. Besluitvorming is daarbinnen een belangrijk onderdeel. In mijn dagelijkse werk met de teams die ik ondersteun gebruik ik de Consent-methode volop.
Mark Boumans
Teamcoach
Als je hetzelfde doel voor ogen hebt, het echt samen wilt doen en er in gelooft dat ieders bijdrage uniek (en daarom van waarde) is, levert het een enorm vertrouwen op. Het proces van besluiten maken zal af en toe meer tijd kosten, maar de uitkomst is een wereld van verschil. Gedragen, duurzaam en ready for take-off.
Gonny Thomassen
Docent en medeoprichter van BuitenDelen
Besluiten nemen met consent leerde ik al tijdens de oprichting van onze school in 2007 kennen, hoewel dat pas later een naam kreeg: sociocratie. Nog veel later leerde ik via een landelijke onderwijskring Baudy kennen en haar insteek voelde meteen heel gelijkwaardig.
Marty Smit
Medeoprichter De Vrije Ruimte
Hoe ga je inclusie handen en voeten geven? Hoe ga je er voor zorgen dat iedere waardevolle bijdrage de aandacht krijgt die het verdient? Dat alle talenten binnen een groep tot haar/zijn recht kunnen komen?
Anneke Post
HR adviseur, aanjager, talentmanagement
Ik werk veel met zelfstandige teams waar de manager op afstand is. Hoe neem je dan weloverwogen, goede en gedragen besluiten? Dit zonder dat het team te gemakkelijk de snelle denkers en de makkelijke praters volgt?
Daniëlle Lewis
Organisatie-, team- en agile coach DLCO.nl

Schrijf je in voor onze
maandelijkse nieuwsbrief

Ontvang gratis de eerste hoofdstukken van ons boek Besluit met CONSENT en ontdek antwoorden op de vragen: Wat is consent en wat levert werken met consent je op?